Tecap – The Test Software for Electronics and Semiconductors. From Engineering to Production.

Does Tecap Fit Your Testing Scenario?

Perhaps you came across Tecap because you are looking for a new test solution. Perhaps your current solution works well overall, but certain tasks are becoming increasingly complex. Or you may want to find out whether your existing structures can be developed further in a sustainable way.

Whether Tecap is suitable depends less on any single feature than on how you want to organize test development, production, hardware, data, and individual requirements.

The following questions can help you assess this.

At a Glance

Do We Really Need to Develop Everything Ourselves?

An automated test system requires far more than the actual measurement process.

Test plans need to be structured, variants managed, instruments integrated, results stored, user interfaces provided, and production processes safeguarded. Over time, companies often develop their own libraries and applications for these tasks.

This can work well. At the same time, these structures need to be maintained continuously and adapted to new requirements.

A platform such as Tecap becomes particularly relevant when many of these recurring tasks should no longer have to be solved again for every project.

Tecap already provides structures for areas such as test plans, variants, system configuration, data logging, production, user management, and analysis.

The real question is therefore less whether these functions can be developed in-house.

It is whether it makes sense to commit your own development resources to maintaining them over the long term.

Would a Common Structure Across Multiple Projects Help Us?

Many companies have powerful in-house software libraries and proven project templates.

Even so, projects often begin to diverge over time. Requirements are implemented differently, functions are copied, special cases are added, and existing structures are extended for specific projects.

This is not necessarily a problem. It becomes more difficult when changes increasingly depend on project-specific knowledge or improvements have to be implemented several times.

Tecap can provide a common underlying structure.

Test plans, variants, system configuration, data logging, and production processes follow the same principles, while test programs and individual extensions can still differ.

If projects need to remain different while their basic organization should not have to be reinvented each time, a common platform can provide a clear advantage.

Can We Continue Using Our Existing Hardware?

A new software foundation does not automatically require a new test system.

Measurement instruments, switching equipment, adapters, and complete systems often have significantly longer service lives than the software structures used to operate them.

If the existing hardware remains suitable for the task, there is little reason to replace it solely because the software is being modernized.

Tecap is therefore not tied to a specific system architecture or measurement platform. Existing hardware can be integrated and combined with new components.

Many measurement, stimulation, and switching instruments are already integrated through the Tecap Instruments Pack. Additional instruments can also be added.

This allows modernization to take place where it is actually needed without calling functioning parts of the test system into question.

Do Engineering and Production Have to Be Separate Worlds?

Engineering is where systems are developed, modified, and tested. Production, on the other hand, depends on stability, traceability, and reproducible processes.

These different requirements can easily cause software versions, tools, and working methods to drift apart.

One alternative is to represent engineering and production within the same project model while still keeping their responsibilities clearly separated.

Tecap follows this principle.

Development versions, variants, and releases are managed within the project. Engineering and production each use applications and permissions tailored to their respective tasks.

If significant effort is currently required to transfer changes from engineering into production in a controlled way, a shared project model can be valuable.

Are We Really Using Our Test Data as Effectively as We Could?

The most immediate information produced by a test is often simply: Pass or Fail.

Over the lifetime of a production process, however, far more data is generated.

Measurement values, statistics, trends, waveforms, batch information, and failure frequencies can provide insights into how the product, process, or test system is developing.

Tecap stores test results in a structured form and makes them available both during test execution and for subsequent analysis.

With Result Analyst, for example, statistical distributions, trends, stability, and wafer and tray data can be analyzed.

If test results are mainly stored today but require additional effort before they can be analyzed effectively, an integrated data foundation can make a significant difference.

Can a Standard Platform Accommodate Our Special Requirements?

Hardly any test process is completely standardized.

Companies differ in their production workflows, IT systems, handling processes, data formats, operating concepts, and organizational requirements.

A platform is therefore only useful if its standardization still allows these differences to be accommodated.

Tecap provides plugins and APIs for this purpose.

They can be used, for example, to add custom production processes, user interfaces, MES or ERP integrations, additional data processing, and specialized instrument integrations.

The platform provides the common structures, while individual functions remain separate from them.

The key question is therefore not necessarily “standard or individual?”, but which parts actually need to be individual.

Will Our Solution Remain Extensible in the Long Term?

A test solution usually needs to remain operational for much longer than the project in which it was originally created.

Products change. Operating systems and development tools evolve. New instruments, interfaces, and requirements are introduced.

With in-house solutions, continued development depends on whether sufficient time and expertise remain available internally over the long term.

Tecap, by contrast, is continuously developed as a standalone product. Requirements from different applications can become features that are subsequently available to all users.

This includes new capabilities as well as instrument integration, interfaces, usability, performance, and stability.

If a test platform is intended not only to solve today's task but also to provide a foundation for future projects, this difference becomes increasingly relevant over time.

So, Does Tecap Fit Your Situation?

A feature list alone can hardly answer that question.

You may recognize several of your own requirements in the situations described above. Perhaps only some of them apply. And for your particular task, a different approach may also be more appropriate.

If this assessment suggests that Tecap could generally fit your testing scenario, contact us.

We will review your current situation together and discuss, without obligation, which approaches make sense and where Tecap can contribute.

How Tecap Brings These Elements Together

The requirements described above usually have one thing in common: many of the tasks surrounding testing are closely interconnected.

Tecap therefore brings test plans, system configuration, measurement instruments, variants, production processes, result data, and analysis together within a common software platform.

The aim is not to force every testing scenario into a rigid structure. Recurring tasks are given a common framework, while individual test programs, processes, and extensions retain their place.

This creates a technical foundation that can be used from engineering through production and developed further across different projects.

Software for Automated Testing. Built on Experience.